.oo.

On the Broad Gauge

Life from the West Sunshine State with a transport bent

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Peak Oil (1)

When you spend as much time as I do hanging around groups concerned with urban sustainability, you tend to get bombarded with the “Peak Oil” message. In fact, much of the effort of the Sustainable Transport Coalition of WA (STC) in the past 3 years has revolved around this concept.

Now, despite the endless talks and presentation and papers that I have read, I have still been very uncomfortable about the whole concept. I keep feeling that there are too many ‘leaps of logic’ taking place which results in me not being willing to accept the arguments put forward.

In order to try to sort this out I am going to put together a collection of posts that will, if all goes well, both summarise and clarify the arguments and lead to some sort of conclusion.

In this first post I will simply state the tenets of the Peak Oil arguments as I understand them to be. In the next post I plan to try to untangle the various statements regarding “supply” and “demand” and put them on a more accurate economic footing. Finally, I will review the arguments and try to reach a conclusion on points I agree or disagree with, and the areas where I feel that more information is needed.

...

Like many major theories that are developed in the public arena, discussions of Peak Oil are frequently either bogged down in minutiae, or jump into the middle of arguments without stating basic assumptions. Nevertheless, distilling the information that I have seen, I reach the conclusion that the Peak Oil arguments are based on 5 key points (assumptions and/or conclusions):

1. Geological Constraints
It is a geological fact that there is a fixed amount of oil in the ground, as the bio-physical processes required to generate oil take eons. No matter how much we wish, we cannot generate more than exists in nature.

2. Rising Demand
The overall demand for oil is rising rapidly in the world, not the least through the rapid industrialisation in China, rising wealth in countries such as India and the growth in the use of larger vehicles in the US (and Australia).

3. Reserves and Production
Central to the whole debate is the question of “reserves”. Wikipedia defines “oil reserves” as “portions of oil in place that are recoverable under economic constraints” and goes onto add “[o]il in the ground is not a reserve unless it is economically recoverable” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves).

It follows therefore that there is a point beyond which extraction of oil becomes economically and technologically unfeasible from any particular site.

The Peak Oil argument takes this one step further and concludes that overall there is a fixed quantity of oil available for extraction (1) and, given ever increasing demand for oil (2) at some point the total world production of oil will “peak.

A good deal of the argument regarding Peak Oil revolves around the question of how accurate are the various predictions of reserves (proven or otherwise) and exactly when this peak will occur.

This is illustrated in the following diagram (source: ASPO Australia website) which is typical of the charts produced by Peak Oil proponents.



4. Rapid drop in production following peak

Associated with the “peaking” argument is the conclusion that after the peak, the amount of oil being produced will drop rapidly, causing major rise in the price of oil

5. Vulnerability

Finally, there is the conclusion from (1) to (4) which is that our current society is so tightly bound to crude oil (for which there is no realistic substitute) that the rapid decrease in production following the peak will generate shortages, inflation and major social dislocation.

The whole argument can be summarised in this quote by Iranian oil researcher Samsam Bakhtiari (frequently quoted by the STC)

"Seen from a Middle Eastern perspective, the present global oil situation can be summarised within five major and inescapable trends:
  • The world's super giant and giant oil fields are dying off;
  • There are no more major frontier regions left to explore besides the earth's poles;
  • Production of non-conventional crude oil has been initiated at great costs --- in Venezuela's Orinoco belt, Canada's Athabasca tar sands and ultra-deep waters;
  • Even OPEC's oil production has its limits;
  • No major primary energy rival can possibly take over from oil and gas in the medium term.
Adding up these five trends, one can envision a global oil crunch at the horizon --- most probably within the present decade....." "...It would take a number of miracles to thwart such a rational scenario. Now, a single miracle is always a possibility, but a series of simultaneous miracles is not --- for there are limits even to God Almighty's mercifulness".
(Samsam Bakhtiari, 2002)

http://www.aspo-australia.org.au/content/view/18/41/


Next time: Can demand exceed supply, and other economic arguements

Sunday, May 21, 2006

More career talk

In the past 7 days or so I have had two three job interviews (2 of them for graduate positions), one medical examination, one project meeting and one offer of more project work. Nearly all of this happened on Friday.

At the moment I am thinking of accepting the project work (which will take me through to the end of the year), withdrawing one of the job applications that would have locked me here for 12 months, and hoping for one of the graduate positions to come through (which I have high hopes for - one of them talked of flying me interstate for another interview).

Oh yes, I also had a Uni assignment due for posting on Friday.

Given all that, the promised post on Peak Oil has been delayed. In the meantime, can I recommend the interesting series of posts on this an other similar topics over at Oikos.

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Google Sustainability

Google has recently released a new tool "Google Trends". You give it a search term and it returns the "top 10" locations for that term. It then reports the proportion of searches from that location that are for the specified term

Out of interest, I plugged in the term "sustainability" and this is what I got

1. Melbourne Australia


2. Perth Australia


3. Adelaide Australia


4. Brisbane Australia


5. Vancouver Canada


6. Sydney Australia


7. Portland United States


8. Ottawa Canada


9. Auckland New Zealand


10. Washington United States


(http://www.google.com/trends?q=sustainability)

This suggests to me that Sustainability is an Australian-lead phenomenon (plus the Usual Suspects from Canada).

I then threw in the term "Sustainable Development" and got a somewhat different result:



1. Ottawa Canada


2. Delhi India


3. Brisbane Australia


4. Hong Kong Hong Kong


5. Washington United States


6. Perth Australia


7. Edinburgh United Kingdom


8. Calgary Canada


9. London United Kingdom


10. Sydney Australia


(http://www.google.com/trends?q=sustainable+development&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all)

Australia and Canada are still represented, but now the UK and India are added. The US is still under-represented.

I am sure there are some interesting conclusions to be made from all of this.

Edited to add: Sorry about the wonky formatting. I cut and pasted the graphs directly from Google, and don't have the time to play with the code behind them to resize to fit.

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Telecommunications Update

My old Nokia phone was developing an annoying habit of turning itself off at random (usually during important things like telephone job interviews) so I have gone and got myself a new phone.

Somehow or other (*) I ended up with a Motorola V3X (3G) phone. It is as different from a classic Nokia as a phone can be.

So in the next few days if you phone and/or text me, I apolgise in advance if the response isn't as quick as it might be. It will take me a while to work out how the darned thing works

*OK, it was on special at the Telstra shop with their basic plan.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Careers

The last couple of days have been rather frantic, in terms of possible career options (ie. jobs). Indeed it has been a case of good news/bad news all the way

Good news: I got through stage 1 screening (phone interview) for SKM graduate programme
Bad news: I think I bombed out on stage 2 (online aptitude test) especially the numbers bit. 21 questions involving ratios and percentages in 20 minutes is a pretty hard slog.

Good news: PATREC/Transperth project got the go-ahead today
Bad news: PATREC will want me to provide professional indemnity insurance (for a 6 months x 1 day per week project)

Good news: DPI has advertised a position for Assistant Transport Modeller (no experience necessary, but interest, aptitude and some knowledge essential - i.e. me!)
Bad news: This is full time and would almost certainly mean giving up PATREC project if I got it

Good news: just this past hour got news that I was shortlisted for sustainability position at City of Stirling and now booked for an interview later this week.
Bad news: ... ???

Friday, May 05, 2006

Organisations

Well, what a dud Monday's post turned out to be. Obviously no car drivers read this blog. I am still looking for info., so do please wander past and post if you can.

On an entirely different topic.

I think I am going to bow out of the Sustainable Transport Coalition. It is a pity, it came highly recommended when I came to Perth, but it really just isn't me. It is hard to say why, but I think it is because it is full of people who (a) are in favour of 'balanced' transport (ie roads for freight), (b) hate public transport, especially rail and (c) can't stop taking about Peak Oil. I know I should get in there, educate, reform etc. but I just don't have the energy any more.

On the other hand, I am going to get more involved in the Sustainability Practitioners Association. This is a bunch of more 'switched on' people who are keen to make a difference in the world. I have agreed to take on the task of looking after their website. Yes, another one :-)

Monday, May 01, 2006

Petrol survey

I'm doing a little not-very-scientific survey related to marginal pricing and I hope you can help.

What I want to know is, if you have a car (a) does it get used everyday (or nearly everyday) to get you to work (or Uni/school if you are a FT student) (b) roughly how often you fill up the tank and (c) how long a trip you would have to make before you started factoring petrol prices in (feel free to answer 'dunno' to this one)

It would be a really useful if anyone who happens to wander by and reads this could leave a comment with the above info. Feel free to remain anon. if you wish.

Oh yeah, if I don't know you personally, it would be good if you could also mention what city/town you live in.

Thanks heaps.